Strengths Coaching Blog

Monday, March 5, 2018

Mastery Monday: Productive Aiming: Analytical

By Albert L. Winseman, D.Min



Where did you get that information? What does the data say? Have you done your homework? What are your sources? What is the evidence to back it up? How do you know this will work? 

If you have Analytical among your Signature Themes, these are most likely very familiar questions — perhaps ones you ask on a regular basis. Analytical focuses on facts to find patterns and reach conclusions. Those with strong Analytical talents tend to be logical and rigorous in their thinking; before acting, they will weigh the evidence and study the data to make an informed decision — and only when convinced by the evidence the data provides will they take action. Sound thinking is the hallmark of the Analytical theme and objectivity is the goal.


Analytical: Helps and Hinders 

When coaching those with Analytical as a Signature Theme, helping them claim both the “helps and hinders” of Analytical is critical to productive aiming. Some common helps and hinders of Analytical include:

Helps

  • You are a logical thinker. You gather facts and information, and as such, you make sound decisions.
  • Your Analytical theme makes you credible — your evidence-based decision making creates trust.
  • You have a knack for asking the right people the right questions, gaining insights into what you and your team need to be successful.
  • You have a dispassionate approach to decision making, which makes you an asset in highly emotional situations. You can clearly assess the situation and your data-driven approach can calm the storm.

Hinders

  • Your Analytical talents can lead you to take emotion out of the decision-making process, which can be perceived by others as uncaring, skeptical or harsh.
  • Because you ask a lot of questions, others may see you as someone who always doubts or questions the validity of their work, which can be demoralizing.
  • You may tend to keep your thought processes to yourself, and only share your conclusions with others. Your team members need to see and hear your logic — find ways to let others know how you come to the conclusions you reach.
  • Due to your focus on evidence and question-asking to assess the soundness of any approach, others may perceive you as negative toward or unsupportive of new initiatives.  That is not necessarily the case, so find ways to communicate to your team that your questioning is not about being negative, but is a way of ensuring all factors are taken into consideration to find the best route forward.

Analytical: Self-Awareness, Self-Expression, Self-Regulation

To productively aim their Analytical talents at a particular goal, an individual must have: 1) good self-awareness about the theme’s power, edge and vulnerabilities; 2) an understanding of how this theme finds expression in day-to-day thinking, feeling and behaving; 3) an understanding of how to regulate their Analytical to maximize the potential positive outcomes that can be achieved through intentionally applying a strengths-based approach. Coaches can help clients with strong Analytical talents by exploring some the following:

Self-Awareness

  • The Power and Edge of Analytical:  Those with Analytical as one of their Signature Themes find great satisfaction in uncovering the essential facts needed to make wise decisions. This information leads to effective action and can prevent serious errors that can come from acting too soon. Analytical examines and inquires, and then reaches a conclusion.
  • The Vulnerabilities of Analytical: Because they tend to ask critical questions and explore all the ramifications, those high in Analytical talents often can be seen as negative and untrusting of others. People may feel that their opinions aren’t valued by those with strong Analytical talents and may cease to offer their ideas. As a coach, you can help your Analytical clients manage this perception by guiding them in thinking about how they can reinforce the value each person brings to a team, while still not sacrificing rigorous examination of the facts in front of them.

Self-Expression

Coaches can assist clients in realizing and claiming the expression of Analytical talents by helping them explore past instances when this theme has been particularly useful. To facilitate this exploration, coaches can ask questions like the following:

  • Tell me about your best day at work. What made it a great day? (listen for expression of Analytical)
  • When was the last time your examination of the data at hand prevented a serious error? How did you feel?
  • Who is your best thought partner when exploring options? What do you value most about them?
  • What does your team or your supervisor value most about you and your work?

Self-Regulation

Self-Regulation occurs when individuals know which of their talents to use in particular situations, or know which talents to combine to sharpen, accelerate or soften a specific talent. For example, Analytical’s questioning, “prove it to me” nature can be mistakenly viewed as negative or resistant to change. It is then that a coach can help the client find other talents they might use instead to help others feel valued and respected — and help others value your client’s talent for critical thinking. Coaches also can help clients explore different theme combinations to sharpen, accelerate or soften their Analytical. For example: 

  • Themes that tend to sharpen Analytical: Deliberative, Self-Assurance, Focus,  Input, Learner, Context, Restorative
  • Themes that tend to accelerate Analytical — i.e., themes that move Analytical from thinking to doing: Achiever, Activator, Competition, Command, Maximizer
  • Themes that tend to soften Analytical: Relator, Connectedness, Empathy, Developer, Harmony

Analytical: Five Powerful Questions for Productive Aiming

  • In what work situations and environments are you most productive?
  • What are you known for on your team or in your organization? What are some ways you can intentionally help others see the value in your questioning and evaluating?
  • What are the roadblocks to your team’s or organization’s success? What are the critical factors that need to be solved — and what information and analysis will be needed?
  • Who would benefit the most from your unblinking, analytical eye toward a problem? How will you approach them to let them know of your willingness to help? How can you help them see the value you would bring to the situation?
  • How do you know you are successful? How do you measure success? What additional metrics or data would be important for an accurate evaluation?

Catch the latest on all Theme Thursday episodes here

Register for the 2018 CliftonStrengths Summit here!

Al Winseman bio is below


Albert L. Winseman, D.Min., is a Senior Learning and Development Consultant at Gallup. Al brings deep expertise in employee and customer engagement, executive leadership and organizational dynamics to his consulting work with Gallup’s clients. He consults with senior leaders, executives and front-line managers to improve employee and customer engagement and to implement strategic initiatives that drive business growth.

Al's top 5 strengths are: Ideation | Futuristic | Maximizer | Strategic | Command. 

2 comments :

Featherstone said...

Being an analytical type I approached this article with an eye toward critiquing the author's arguments. However, Dr. Winseman is right on target. The only thing I would add is that a good way to shift the analytical individual in a positive direction is for the coach to encourage the analytical client to identify the multiple reasons why someone else's idea is a good one. The analytical will then be using their power for good, and most likely they will be able to see strengths that others have missed. This will encourage the person who offered the idea in the first place. The analytical person may indicate that they can't take this approach, because they honestly don't support the idea. As their coach, I simply remind them that the goal is not always to be right, the goal is also to develop relationships. They can mitigate the problem of supporting a position they don't agree with simply by beginning their insights with this phrase, "While I can perceive some reasons not to support this idea, here are some reasons this plan has benefits."

Ralph Rickenbach said...

I agree with the assessment of analytical offered in the article.

One remark: in the article, its is said that people tend to withhold their ideas from analytical because they receive the responses as negative and unsupportive.

I have found that most people tend to keep on offering their ideas, followed by a rant that I am unsupportive and negative and need to change. This led me to not offer my insight any longer, and in most settings, to leave after a while as I was not able to contribute my 5 cents to projects.

I would love to hear how somebody high in analytical can actually get people to understand their power and edge. Usually, long term projects do not offer enough time to build trust as the benefits of analytical will show up way past the frustration threshold of the team members.

My dominant strengths are: ideation, learner, deliberative, intellection, futuristic, connectedness, strategic, analytical, input. My strengths sharpen analytical, while there is none to soften it. My connectedness is all about concepts and the big picture, not about people.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Search This Blog for Coaching Topics